Event dated 2025-03-08

Eight people were injured when a driver rammed a CarMax dealership in Inglewood, California, according to local authorities and NBC Los Angeles. Police said the crash was intentional and followed a dispute involving a customer at the site on South La Cienega Boulevard.

The reported sequence began just after 2 p.m. when authorities responded to the dealership in the 8600 block of South La Cienega Boulevard. NBC Los Angeles reported that a customer exited the building after a dispute and then deliberately drove into the showroom. The impact injured several employees and customers inside the store, turning what had been a commercial dispute into a violent public-safety incident.

Officials said six of the injuries were minor and two were critical. CarMax confirmed that two of the injured were employees and said they were treated at hospital for non-life-threatening injuries. That left a mixed picture of harm: the official injury total was significant, but the immediate aftermath suggested that not all of the injured required the same level of care.

The driver later fled the crash and turned himself in at the LAPD Academy nearby, according to the report. Authorities identified him as 25-year-old Andrew Arroyo. NBC Los Angeles also said he was on probation at the time of his arrest for a 2024 wet reckless charge. Those details help establish that the case was being handled as more than an ordinary traffic collision, especially given police descriptions of the act as intentional.

CarMax issued a statement saying a customer drove through its Inglewood store, hitting and injuring associates and customers, and that the company was cooperating with authorities. The dealership remained closed the following day, and the company had not announced a reopening date. That closure underscores how directly a single violent act can disrupt an ordinary retail operation.

The Inglewood Police Department said the crash was being investigated as an intentional act. That matters because it shapes the likely legal and investigative path: what might otherwise have been treated as an accident instead raises questions about motive, intent and whether the driver’s dispute with the dealership escalated into a deliberate attack.

The report did not state that the incident was linked to terrorism or any broader plot. On the available facts, it was a localized act of violence with immediate victims and a clear target: the dealership showroom and the people inside. The most important public-interest element was the way a commercial disagreement escalated into a dangerous vehicle attack.

For Inglewood residents and CarMax employees, the event’s significance lies in the fact that a busy retail site became the scene of an intentional ramming and a mass injury incident. The available reporting supports a narrow, factual account: a customer drove into the dealership, eight people were hurt, and police were treating the episode as deliberate.

The event date of 2025-03-08 places the attack in a weekend context, when a retail location would have had staff and customers on site. That timing likely contributed to the number of people injured and the seriousness of the scene.