Violent protests in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir have left at least eight people dead, according to Pakistani officials, after thousands gathered in Muzaffarabad to challenge privileges enjoyed by the regional political class.

The unrest began on Monday and quickly escalated into four days of clashes that local authorities have struggled to contain. Protesters have demanded an end to benefits such as free electricity and expensive cars for officials, a grievance that has helped drive one of the territory’s most serious episodes of public anger in recent months.

Officials responded by shutting down internet and mobile phone services, a move that cut off much of the territory from outside communication just as the protests intensified. According to reports on the ground cited by the evidence packet, local media were also warned against covering the demonstrations, adding pressure to an already tense information environment.

The dead included three police officers and five civilians, according to two security officials quoted by Reuters in the evidence supplied to NeoTechNews. The AP-style reporting also described streets in Muzaffarabad stained with blood and littered with spent bullet casings, broken glass and stones after the clashes.

The protests have been led by the Awami Action Committee, a civil rights group that says it is campaigning for local rights in the mostly rural, Muslim-majority region. Its leaders said police had fired at demonstrators. Protest leader Shaukat Nawaz said the bullets being used were made in Pakistan and were being turned against people in the territory instead of against an external enemy.

Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, has now moved to defuse the crisis by setting up a committee of senior officials to investigate the violence and seek a political settlement. Sharif’s office said the panel would also hold talks with protesters. In comments reported by DW, Sharif said the government was ready to resolve the problems of its Kashmiri brothers.

The shutdown of communications, the reported pressure on media, and the death toll all point to a protest movement that has moved beyond a local grievance and into a major political crisis for the administration in the territory. The immediate trigger may have been benefits for the political elite, but the speed with which the unrest spread suggests wider frustration over how power and resources are distributed in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir.

The situation also comes against the backdrop of Kashmir’s long-running territorial dispute between Pakistan and India. That dispute has shaped security policy and political life in the region for decades, but the present unrest is rooted in local anger over privilege, policing and access to basic services.

For now, the government appears to be combining force, communications controls and negotiation. Whether the newly announced committee can slow the unrest will depend on whether officials are prepared to address the demands that brought thousands into the streets in the first place.