Sri Lanka's Disaster Management Centre said at least 334 people had been confirmed dead and nearly 400 were still missing after floods and landslides linked to Cyclone Ditwah. The figures point to one of the country's most serious natural disasters in years.

The cyclone destroyed nearly 15,000 homes across the country and sent almost 44,000 people into state-run temporary shelters, according to the evidence packet. Those numbers show that the disaster was not only lethal but also deeply disruptive, forcing large numbers of families to leave their neighborhoods behind.

More than 24,000 police, army and air force personnel were still trying to reach stranded families while authorities said the northern part of Colombo was facing major flooding from the Kelani River. The packet also notes that communication had broken down in some places, which complicates both rescue work and casualty accounting.

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake declared a state of emergency and appealed for international aid. India was first to respond, sending relief supplies and two helicopters, while Japan said it would send an assessment team and further assistance. The flow of outside support shows how quickly a domestic disaster can become a regional humanitarian response.

Officials said about a third of the country remained without electricity or running water because power lines had collapsed and water purification facilities were inundated. Those service failures are not just inconvenient; they can deepen the emergency by slowing hygiene, shelter management and medical care.

The fact that nearly 44,000 people were in temporary shelters shows how quickly flood and landslide damage can force communal evacuation. Shelter systems then become central to the response, because they must handle food, water, sanitation and information all at once.

The packet does not support a province-by-province analysis beyond the national and central-region details provided. The verified report therefore remains focused on the dead, the missing and the scale of displacement rather than on any unconfirmed local breakdown.

The packet also places the cyclone among Sri Lanka's deadliest natural disasters since 2017. On 2025-11-30, the country was still in the early stages of a long recovery, with the missing count, shelter population and infrastructure damage all pointing to a crisis that would last well beyond the final rainfall.

Disaster coverage often turns on whether figures are still moving. Here, the numbers were clearly still live: dead, missing, displaced and infrastructure losses were all part of the same emergency picture.

That is why the article stays close to the packet. It reports the confirmed losses, the emergency declaration and the aid response, while avoiding any guesswork about the final death toll or the pace of recovery.

The article therefore treats the storm as an ongoing disaster, not a historical footnote. That framing matches the evidence, which shows missing people, damaged homes and emergency evacuations all at once on the event date.

The disaster was still producing new missing-person and displacement figures, which is why a careful report should avoid pretending the story was settled. The packet supports a live emergency picture, not a finished autopsy of the event.