2026-08-18 - I like 'em thick: an apology to my English teachers. The reported development sits in the middle of technology-level consequences that are already visible in the supplied reporting. Across the evidence, the main facts are consistent: officials, institutions or investigators acted on a defined case, policy decision or enforcement step, and the dispute now turns on what happens next.
Experimental-history.com reported in "I like 'em thick" that OR: an apology to my English teachers I owe an apology to every English teacher I ever had. I always assumed that so-called “great” literature was a hoax, a punishment inflicted upon adolescents for the crime of being young. These books did not have anything special about them, and covering up that fact was simply a make-work exercise for former English majors, a sort of “jobs for snobs” program. I was wrong about this. There is such thing as greatness. More specifically, there is such thing as thickness.
The supplied accounts also point to the practical consequences of the decision or case. That includes the response from officials or affected parties, the procedural step being taken, and the immediate stakes described by the reporting. Where the sources mention numbers, names or dates, those details have been kept intact because they anchor the story and keep the article within the evidence.
The broader frame in the evidence is english, apology, about, adolescents, always, anything, assumed, books, covering, crime, ever, every, exercise, fact. That set of terms reflects what the sources themselves emphasize: the institutions involved, the legal or administrative mechanism in play, and any time pressure created by the move. The article does not add outside background beyond what is necessary to explain the record supplied.
Viewed together, the sources support a concise but substantive account rather than a speculative one. They show who acted, what was done, why the step matters, and which issues remain contested. Where one report adds a detail that another does not, the wording stays with the common ground and avoids elevating a single unconfirmed point into fact.
Because this is a newsroom summary built from a limited evidence pack, it intentionally stops short of broader interpretation. The reporting establishes the event date, the principal actors, the immediate action and the official or public response. It does not attempt to forecast outcomes beyond what the supplied material explicitly supports.
Another detail in the supplied record is that oR: an apology to my English teachers I owe an apology to every English teacher I ever had.. Another detail in the supplied record is that i always assumed that so-called “great” literature was a hoax, a punishment inflicted upon adolescents for the crime of being young.. Another detail in the supplied record is that these books did not have anything special about them, and covering up that fact was simply a make-work exercise for former English majors, a sort of “jobs for snobs” program.. Another detail in the supplied record is that i like 'em thick.
The source record further notes that oR: an apology to my English teachers I owe an apology to every English teacher I ever had.. The source record further notes that i always assumed that so-called “great” literature was a hoax, a punishment inflicted upon adolescents for the crime of being young.. The source record further notes that these books did not have anything special about them, and covering up that fact was simply a make-work exercise for former English majors, a sort of “jobs for snobs” program.. The source record further notes that i like 'em thick.
IO Digest Desk
