# Intel names interim co-CEOs after Pat Gelsinger retires
Event date: 2024-12-02.
Intel said chief executive Pat Gelsinger retired from the company and stepped down from the board, prompting the appointment of two interim co-CEOs as the chipmaker searches for a permanent successor.
The company named David Zinsner, Intel's chief financial officer, and Michelle Johnston Holthaus as interim co-chief executive officers. Holthaus also took on the newly created role of CEO of Intel Products. Frank Yeary, Intel's independent board chair, became interim executive chair during the transition.
This is a notable management change because it comes at a moment when Intel is trying to restore confidence in its product and manufacturing strategy. The release said the board formed a search committee and would look for a permanent CEO. It also stressed product leadership, manufacturing competitiveness and efficiency as priorities.
The retirement ends a long Intel career for Gelsinger. The company said he had been with Intel for more than 40 years, originally joining in 1979, and later becoming its first chief technology officer. Intel's announcement framed his exit as a major transition after a challenging year for the company.
The report is also notable for how it distributes power during the interim period. Zinsner brings financial and operational experience. Holthaus has spent nearly three decades at Intel and was already leading the Client Computing Group before moving into the new product-focused role. That structure suggests the board wanted continuity in both finance and product execution while the search continues.
Intel's statement did not present the move as a crisis. It was careful to say the company remained focused on simplifying the product portfolio, improving manufacturing and foundry capabilities, and optimizing costs. But the combination of a CEO retirement and interim co-leadership still signals a real change in direction.
For investors and customers, the immediate takeaway is that Intel is moving ahead under temporary leadership while trying to steady itself. The permanent test will be whether the next chief executive can carry that strategic reset through to measurable progress.
Intel's transition also reflects a broader semiconductor challenge: leadership changes are never just about the person leaving, because investors read them as clues about strategy, execution and urgency. The board's choice to split interim control suggests it wanted both financial oversight and product continuity while it searched.
That is a sensible structure for a company trying to steady itself. A finance leader and a product leader can cover different parts of the business without forcing a rushed permanent appointment. The announcement does not say the plan will work; it only shows Intel moving quickly to avoid a vacuum at the top.
The release also shows Intel trying to project steadiness while acknowledging change. By emphasizing the search for a permanent successor, it signals that the interim phase is temporary, not a new operating model. That matters for a company whose execution problems are often discussed in terms of years rather than quarters.
For readers tracking Intel closely, the announcement is also a signal that the board is trying to manage the transition with minimal disruption. The interim setup gives the company time to search without leaving the product and finance functions exposed. The source does not say how long that search will take, but it does show that Intel moved immediately to put a structure in place.


