# Sahel states say they will quit the ICC, denouncing it as neo-colonial
Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger have announced that they will withdraw from the International Criminal Court, escalating a long-running break with Western institutions and sharpening the political message of the Alliance of Sahel States.
On 2025-09-22, the three military-led governments issued a joint statement saying the court in The Hague had become an instrument of imperial control rather than an impartial justice body, according to evidence source 7280. They argued that the ICC had proved incapable of dealing with war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and crimes of aggression. They also said they wanted to build indigenous mechanisms for peace and justice.
The move matters because it formalises a posture these governments have already taken in foreign policy. Each of the three states came to power through coups between 2020 and 2023, later aligned themselves in the Alliance of Sahel States, and have since pulled further away from France and other Western partners while drawing closer to Russia.
The ICC has a limited but defined role in global justice. It prosecutes the most serious international crimes when national systems cannot or will not do so. The withdrawal notice does not take immediate effect; under the court's rules, a state leaves one year after the official notice is filed with the UN secretary general.
That timing matters because the Sahel region remains engulfed in conflict. The three countries are facing deadly attacks from jihadist groups linked to al-Qaeda and the Islamic State, while their own forces have also been accused of abuses against civilians. By turning away from the ICC, the governments are signalling that they want to control the legal and political framing of that violence themselves.
The announcement also arrives while Russia continues to expand its influence in parts of Africa. The evidence notes that the Sahel leaders have grown closer to Moscow, including to a government whose president is himself the subject of an ICC arrest warrant over the war in Ukraine. That context helps explain the political charge embedded in the joint statement: the withdrawal is not just a legal move, but a diplomatic one.
For the ICC, the announcement is another sign of the pressure the court faces from governments that see international justice as selective or politically biased. For the Sahel states, it is a way to present themselves as defenders of sovereignty while rejecting outside scrutiny. Whether they can create credible domestic alternatives is a separate question.
Citations
- Source 7280: joint withdrawal statement, reasons given, one-year withdrawal rule, broader geopolitical context.



