RSF drone attack in southeastern Sudan kills ten civilians, medics say
Event date: January 12, 2026. Anadolu reported that a Rapid Support Forces drone attack in Singa, in Sudan's Sennar State, killed ten civilians and wounded nine others, according to medics. The source also says the Sudan Doctors Network condemned the strike as the deliberate targeting of civilians outside military objectives and described it as a full-fledged war crime.
The casualty count is the core of the story. Ten people killed and nine injured is a severe toll for any single attack, and the fact that the victims were described as civilians makes the event especially important in a war where combatants and non-combatants are often separated only by how they are reported after the fact. The source does not identify the dead or say where they were when the drone hit.
What makes the report more serious is the language used by the medical group. The network is not making a court ruling, but its statement shows how healthcare workers are interpreting the attack: as intentional harm to people who were not part of a military objective. That is a strong accusation and one the article should attribute carefully rather than repeat as fact beyond the group's own claim.
Singa's location in southeastern Sudan also matters because it places the attack within a wider conflict landscape that has seen heavy civilian suffering. The source does not unpack the battle lines or who controlled the area at the time, so the safest report is to keep the geography broad and the attribution precise. What is verified is that medics said civilians were killed and injured in a drone strike there.
This kind of reporting is often stripped down to numbers, but the human meaning is larger. A death toll like this can shut down markets, schools and clinics, even when the source does not list those consequences. It can also deepen fear that no place is safe, including towns far from the most prominent front lines. The medical group's condemnation suggests exactly that: an attack that was felt as a warning to civilians.
The excerpt does not provide the target, the method of confirmation or any government response. That leaves one factually solid centre for the story. A drone attack hit Singa, ten civilians were killed, nine others were wounded and medics said the strike was a deliberate attack on people outside military objectives.
That is enough to show why the incident drew a strong reaction from doctors. In a war already marked by mass displacement and collapsing services, every new civilian death adds pressure to a humanitarian system under strain. The source's message is simple even if the context is not: the RSF attack killed civilians, and the medical network says the attack fits a pattern of war crimes.
