# Iran warns it could target Gulf energy infrastructure if US strikes its power plants

Iran could add Saudi and Emirati energy assets to its targets if the United States attacks its power plants, according to a military source quoted by Tasnim and carried in the supplied MarketScreener item.

The packet identifies Saudi Aramco facilities, the Yanbu area in Saudi Arabia and the Fujairah pipeline in the United Arab Emirates as possible targets in that scenario. The key fact is conditional but stark: an attack on Iranian power plants could prompt retaliation aimed at regional oil and fuel infrastructure.

That warning is important because it widens the possible spillover from a U.S.-Iran confrontation. Energy infrastructure in Saudi Arabia and the UAE sits at the heart of global supply chains, so even a threat to those sites is enough to raise market and security attention. The report does not say an attack has happened, only that Iran would expand its target list if one did.

Because the evidence is a short market report citing Tasnim, the story should be careful not to inflate the certainty or operational detail. What is verified is the existence of the warning and the specific facilities mentioned in the source. The article should avoid claiming that strikes are imminent or that any target has already been hit.

The conditional language also matters diplomatically. By specifying a response in the event of a U.S. attack on power plants, the Iranian side is signaling deterrence rather than announcing immediate action. That distinction can still influence behavior because energy infrastructure is one of the most sensitive categories in any regional confrontation.

The packet does not include a direct response from Saudi Arabia, the UAE or the United States. Nor does it provide evidence of additional military preparations. That means the reporting should stay at the level of the warning itself and the named facilities, not move into speculation about escalatory steps.

Still, even a quoted threat can have market effects because traders, governments and shipping interests tend to price in worst-case scenarios around oil infrastructure. The wording in the supplied source is designed to be read that way, connecting a hypothetical strike on Iranian assets with the possibility of reprisals elsewhere in the Gulf.

For readers, the main point is straightforward: Iran is warning that a strike on its power plants would not be answered narrowly. Instead, the response could expand to the region’s energy system, raising the stakes for Saudi Arabia, the UAE and anyone exposed to broader Gulf supply shocks.