Kuwait has escalated its diplomatic response to recent attacks by filing a second formal protest with the International Civil Aviation Organization over what its civil aviation authority describes as repeated Iranian violations of Kuwaiti airspace and strikes on critical airport infrastructure.

The report, carried by Times Kuwait, says the Public Authority of Civil Aviation condemned attacks on Kuwait International Airport and specifically cited damage to the passenger terminal T1. It also says the authority wants ICAO to take urgent and decisive measures to protect civil aviation, sovereign airspace and airport personnel.

The most serious claim in the packet is that the latest attack on T1 caused fatalities, injuries and extensive material damage, and that it forced the suspension of flights while operations at the airport were temporarily halted. That is why the complaint matters: it is not just a legal filing, but a response to an incident with immediate safety and operational consequences.

The source says the attack happened just 48 hours after the reopening of the same terminal and the resumption of international and regional flights. That detail suggests Kuwait had been trying to restore normal air traffic when the new strike occurred, making the timing especially damaging from both a safety and confidence standpoint.

The article should stay with the evidence and avoid adding the number of fatalities or identifying victims, because the excerpt does not provide those specifics. It also does not quote Iranian officials or present a formal response from Tehran. What it does show is a clear Kuwaiti effort to escalate the matter internationally rather than handle it only through bilateral channels.

That escalation is reinforced by the authority's language. The complaint describes the incidents as direct threats to passenger safety, airline operations and airport personnel. It also invokes international civil aviation conventions, which signals that Kuwait is trying to frame the issue as a breach of global norms rather than a one-off security incident.

The packet further says Kuwait reserves all rights under international law to protect its sovereignty, airspace and aviation infrastructure. That statement matters because it shows the government treating the episode as both an operational emergency and a sovereignty issue.

The wider context is a period of sustained regional tension. In that environment, airports are especially sensitive targets because disruption can spread quickly from terminals to airlines, cargo flows and public confidence. The article should not speculate on broader strategic consequences, but the source is enough to show that Kuwait sees the problem as serious and ongoing.

On the evidence provided, the story is clear: Kuwait has lodged another protest with ICAO, says Iranian attacks have hit its airspace and airport infrastructure, and is asking for urgent international action to prevent recurrence.